Skip to content
Skip to content
Euphoria Unleashed

Research notes

How the book decides what it can say.

Most writing about Trance and the brain overstates what's known. Euphoria Unleashed tries not to, and this page sets out the standard it holds itself to so you can judge the book by it.

Research principles

01

Separate what's established from what's popular

The claims about rhythm and expectation that the research actually supports are stated as such. The claims that circulate online about particular BPM ranges or frequency combinations acting on human neurochemistry are not, because the evidence doesn't reach that far.

02

Source the claims that carry weight

Dates, records, labels and rooms are the load-bearing parts of a history, so those get sources. Colour and atmosphere don't need a footnote, and pretending otherwise just pads the page count.

03

Mark recollection as recollection

Thirty years of being in those rooms is useful, and it's also memory. Where the book draws on first-hand experience it says so, instead of dressing recollection up as documentation.

04

Leave the gaps visible

Scenes that grew out of flyers, tapes and word of mouth have holes in the record. Where the history is genuinely uncertain or contested, the book says it's uncertain rather than picking the tidiest version.

05

Publish the errors

Anything confirmed wrong is logged in public with the original wording and the fix, then corrected in later revisions.

Common questions

About the sourcing.

Does the book claim Trance changes your brain chemistry?
No. Part One covers prediction, expectation, arousal, memory and synchronised movement, and it says plainly that the popular claim about specific tempos or frequency combinations acting directly on neurochemistry runs ahead of the evidence.
Are claims sourced?
Where a claim matters, yes. Dates, records and rooms are given with sources. Where the research is contested or thin, the book says so rather than smoothing it over.
Is any of it first-hand?
Parts of it. Steve Zenone has followed this music since the 1990s and DJs and produces, so the culture and experience sections are written from inside the scene. First-hand recollection is presented as recollection, not as evidence.
What happens when the book gets something wrong?
Confirmed errors are published on the corrections page with the original text and the corrected text, and they are fixed in later revisions.